Category: Statement

New Corporate Transit Fee Sets an Example of How We Can Fund Essential Infrastructure

Posted on by Nicole Rodriguez

Today, the New Jersey Legislature passed the appropriations act (S2025/A4700) for Fiscal Year 2025, sending the state budget to Governor Murphy’s desk. The budget includes the new Corporate Transit Fee, which dedicates approximately $1 billion to NJ Transit. The 2.5 percent fee only applies to corporations with more than $10 million in profits and will primarily be paid by out-of-state corporations like Amazon, Microsoft, and Walmart. The budget also includes New Jersey’s fourth consecutive full pension payment and increased school funding. In response to the new state budget advancing, New Jersey Policy Perspective (NJPP) issues the following statement.

Nicole Rodriguez, President, NJPP:

“Budgets are about choices, and this budget shows how we all benefit when lawmakers choose people over corporate profits. The new Corporate Transit Fee will literally save NJ Transit, getting the agency’s finances back on track and preventing harmful service cuts that would leave riders stranded. This sets an example of how we can fund essential infrastructure that we all rely on, and how anything is possible when profitable corporations contribute their fair share in taxes. Between the new dedicated funding for transit, robust school funding, and a full pension payment, the budget bill represents a vision for New Jersey where everyone has a fair shot, not just those with high salaries.

“But the work isn’t over if we want an economy that works for the many and not a select few. Maintaining these types of public investments will require more revenue, so state lawmakers will have to find new ways to ensure the wealth generated in New Jersey is reinvested right back into New Jersey, rather than sitting in the bank accounts of corporate executives and shareholders.”

Read NJPP’s analysis detailing which corporations would pay the Corporate Transit Fee.

Read NJPP’s report detailing the history of underfunding at NJ Transit.

# # #

Film Tax Credit Expansion is a Bad Deal for New Jersey

Posted on by Peter Chen

Today the Assembly and Senate budget committees approved yet another expansion to the film and television tax credit program, making it easier for companies to receive credits and allowing film production studios to claim Pennsylvania workers as New Jersey film expenses. Despite overwhelming evidence that film tax credit programs offer pennies on the dollar in benefits for their costs to the state, this bill further loosens the strings on these credits. In response to this proposed legislation, New Jersey Policy Perspective and the American Economic Liberties Project issue the following statement.

Pat Garofalo, State and Local Policy Director, American Economic Liberties Project:

“The proposed changes to New Jersey’s expensive and wasteful film tax credit program make a bad deal even worse. Many of the film production jobs already go to transient workers from out-of-state. Now, this bill would let production companies claim out-of-state Pennsylvania workers — who pay Pennsylvania income taxes — as though they were New Jersey workers, further blunting any economic benefit to the state.”

Peter Chen, Senior Policy Analyst, NJPP:

“Diverting tax credits focused on affordable housing to profitable film production studios undermines their original intent and minimizes the public benefits. As each year passes, the film tax credit program continues to be a bad investment for New Jersey.”

For more information on the shortcomings of New Jersey’s film tax credit program, see NJPP and AELP’s joint analysis on film tax credit expansions.

# # #

Rushed AI Tax Credit Bill Has High Cost, Few Safeguards

Posted on by Peter Chen

Today the legislative budget committees advanced a brand new $500 million tax credit package (A4558/S3432) for artificial intelligence (AI) businesses. These credits would not be required to go towards businesses in economically distressed areas nor would they include more than minimal safeguards against the substantial environmental costs associated with running AI systems. In response to the fast-tracked legislation advancing through committee, New Jersey Policy Perspective (NJPP) issues the following statement.

Peter Chen, Senior Policy Analyst, NJPP:

“Any program that costs this much should be carefully considered before it’s voted on, especially when we’re talking about subsidizing a new industry with major red flags. Artificial intelligence raises serious ethical and environmental concerns, and there’s little to no evidence that this field will create long-term jobs or economic growth for the state. This bill lacks safeguards to ensure it actually benefits New Jersey residents, and this rushed legislative process shuts down any chance to debate or even discuss the merits of the program.

“With the state facing a structural deficit, now is not the time to use public dollars to subsidize private profits in the tech industry.”

# # #

New Corporate Transit Fee is a Historic Win for Riders

Posted on by Alex Ambrose

Today, New Jersey lawmakers introduced and advanced legislation (A4704/S3513) that creates a Corporate Transit Fee and dedicates the proceeds to NJ Transit. Sponsored by Senate President Nick Scutari and Assemblywoman Shama Haider, the legislation establishes the first-ever dedicated funding for NJ Transit in the 45-year history of the agency. The 2.5 percent fee on corporations with more than $10 million in profits would primarily be paid by large multinational corporations headquartered out of state. This follows months of education and advocacy from transit riders, unions, local elected officials, and advocates for a fair budget and reliable transit. In response to the bill advancing, New Jersey Policy Perspective (NJPP) issues the following statement.

Alex Ambrose, Policy Analyst, NJPP:

“This is a historic win for riders and the state of New Jersey as a whole. Until now, NJ Transit has never had a dedicated source of funding, and the new fee will help get the agency back on track after decades of disinvestment. For riders, more funding means more reliable service, and fewer delays and cancellations, and no major service cuts.

“No matter how you look at it, this is the textbook definition of good public policy. The state is making a major investment in a public service that millions of people use, with broad economic benefits, and it’s paid for by profitable corporations that can afford it. With riders about to pay higher fares, this fee makes sure that multinational companies like Amazon are also paying for the infrastructure they benefit from.”

“There are countless advocates, riders, local officials, labor leaders, and lawmakers past and present who made this possible. Thank you to Governor Murphy, legislative leadership, and bill sponsors for taking this historic step towards a more sustainable economic future.”

Read NJPP’s report on the need for dedicated funding for NJ Transit.

Read NJPP’s analysis detailing how most companies that would pay the Corporate Transit Fee are headquartered out-of-state.

# # #

Corporate Transit Fee Will Help Get NJ Transit Back on Track

Posted on by Nicole Rodriguez

Today, Politico New Jersey reported that Governor Murphy and legislative leaders have reached a budget deal that includes the proposed Corporate Transit Fee to fund NJ Transit. This would represent the first-ever source of dedicated state funding for the agency, which faces a looming shortfall of nearly $1 billion once federal pandemic aid expires. In response to the newly announced budget deal, New Jersey Policy Perspective (NJPP) releases the following statement.

Nicole Rodriguez, President, NJPP:

“The corporate transit fee included in the budget deal should have riders breathing a sigh of relief. This dedicated funding is a historic first for NJ Transit and will go a long way toward getting the agency out of the red and back on track. Mass transit is a cornerstone of the state’s economy, so it’s only fair to have the most profitable corporations in the world help fund the infrastructure they benefit from. And regardless of what business lobbyists say, this fee will only be paid by ultra-wealthy corporations like Amazon and Walmart, most of which are headquartered out of state.

“While this news is historic, so are the constant delays and cancellations riders have endured over the past week. NJ Transit has been underfunded for decades, and more support from state and federal lawmakers will be needed to upgrade our infrastructure. But make no mistake, this is a huge win for all of the riders, working families, and communities that rely on NJ Transit’s bus and rail service.”

Read NJPP’s analysis detailing which corporations would pay the Corporate Transit Fee.

Read NJPP’s report detailing the history of underfunding at NJ Transit.

# # #

Dark Day for Transparency and Accountability as Governor Signs Bill Gutting Public Records Law

Posted on by Nicole Rodriguez

Earlier today, Governor Murphy signed a bill that would gut New Jersey’s public records law, making it harder for the public to access data, records, and documents that their state and local governments produce. Despite being opposed by nearly all public testimony and 81 percent of the public in polling, this law will now make it easier for governments to deny records requests, impose costs on requestors, and escape accountability for unlawful denials. In response, New Jersey Policy Perspective (NJPP) issues the following statement.

Nicole Rodriguez, President, NJPP:

“This law is bad policy, bad politics, and bad news for anyone who believes that government should work for the people and not for special interests. Public records are how we shine a spotlight on corruption and hold officials accountable when they’re not doing what’s best for their communities. New Jersey just took a big step forward with our first primary election without ‘the line’ on the ballot, and now the state is taking two even bigger steps backward. This is a dark day for transparency, accountability, and democracy in New Jersey.”

# # #

StayNJ Task Force Report Fails To Fix Regressive Proposal

Posted on by Peter Chen

Earlier today, the StayNJ Task Force released a new report with recommendations on how to implement the StayNJ property tax credit for senior homeowners. This report focuses on the challenges of implementing another complex property tax credit on top of existing credits, but does not comment on the overall structure of the proposal or how the state could pay for it. In response to the new report, New Jersey Policy Perspective (NJPP) issues the following statement.

Peter Chen, Senior Policy Analyst, NJPP:

“The task force report does not change any of the underlying problems with the original StayNJ proposal, namely that it directs the biggest benefits to wealthy homeowners while providing little support for lower-income households and renters struggling to stay in their homes. The report also does not address how the state can realistically pay for the $2 billion program without cutting funding for other essential services and infrastructure.

“The data clearly shows that StayNJ would overwhelmingly go to the highest-income households, sending billions of dollars the state doesn’t have to the residents who need it the least. Because existing property tax relief programs count against the StayNJ benefits, the largest payments would go to homeowners with more than $250,000 in income who make too much to qualify for ANCHOR or the Senior Freeze. This kind of regressive spending program would widen the racial wealth gap and, ironically, make the state less affordable for many lower and middle-income families.

“However the program is administered, StayNJ’s stated goal of helping seniors stay in their homes is still undermined by its disproportionate benefits for high-income homeowners and its neglect of senior renters who are at higher risk of losing their homes.”

Read NJPP’s most recent report on StayNJ here.

Read NJPP’s testimony to the StayNJ Task Force here.

# # #

Giving Businesses Tax Credits for Hybrid Workers Undermines the Very Purpose of the Tax Credits

Posted on by Peter Chen

State lawmakers are fast-tracking a new bill (A4046) that would allow businesses to claim tax subsidies for hiring workers at New Jersey locations, even if they work a majority of the time from home. Similar legislation was fast-tracked during the recent lame duck session and failed to advance after lawmakers criticized the proposal as “counter-intuitive,” and warned that it would have unintended consequences. In response to the proposal, New Jersey Policy Perspective (NJPP) issues the following statement.

Peter Chen, Senior Policy Analyst, NJPP:

“Allowing companies to claim tax credits for employees that aren’t in the office undermines the very purpose of giving out these tax credits in the first place. In theory, the economic benefits are supposed to come from workers going out to buy lunch and spend money at other shops near the office, but this will never happen if employees are working at home instead. Corporate tax credits already have a weak return on investment for communities, and this will only weaken it further. There is no reason for the state and its taxpayers to prop up businesses with public dollars when they aren’t benefiting the broader public.

“A nominal contribution to affordable housing trust funds does not make up for the cost of handing out these tax credits. If this was really about creating more affordable housing, the state should do so directly rather than hand corporations a check only to get a fraction of it back.”

# # #

Budget Proposal Rightly Asks Big Business To Pay for Critical Infrastructure, But More is Needed

Posted on by Nicole Rodriguez

Earlier today, Governor Murphy unveiled his budget proposal for Fiscal Year 2025. The proposal includes a new corporate transit fee on companies earning more than $10 million in annual profits and dedicates those funds to NJ Transit, which would be the first-ever dedicated source of funding in the agency’s history. The budget also includes another full pension payment and would fully fund the school funding formula for the first time in New Jersey history. However, the budget continues to dip into the state’s surplus to cover expenses, highlighting a need for new revenue sources. In response to the budget proposal, New Jersey Policy Perspective (NJPP) releases the following statement.

Nicole Rodriguez, President, NJPP:

“The governor’s budget proposal rightly asks the world’s biggest corporations to pay for the infrastructure that helps generate their record breaking profits. In this current era of rising inequality, if corporations are going to swallow a lion’s share of economic growth, they shouldn’t expect to pay less in taxes and have working families make up the difference. The new corporate transit fee is a testament to the tireless advocacy of workers, transit riders, advocates, and local elected officials in every corner of the state who fought for a fairer tax code.

“This budget proposal still has some red flags that lawmakers will have to address. Even with a strong commitment to long standing funding needs like pensions and schools, the budget proposal still erodes the state’s surplus to fund basic operations. Meanwhile, most programs that promote affordability for low- and moderate-income households like the Child Tax Credit and WorkFirst New Jersey received flat funding – a functional cut in a time of inflation. As New Jerseyans face down fare hikes and cost increases, the onus now shifts to the Legislature to commit to a full reinstatement of the corporate surcharge make the state affordable for all.”

Read NJPP’s latest budget analysis, What to Look for in the New Jersey Budget for Fiscal Year 2025.

# # #

Gov. Murphy’s NJ Transit Funding Proposal Would Put Agency Back on Track

Posted on by Alex Ambrose

Later today, Governor Murphy will announce the first-ever dedicated source of funding for NJ Transit: A new Corporate Transit Fee of 2.5 percent on corporations with more than $10 million in annual profit. The tax is a scaled-down version of the Corporation Business Tax surcharge on corporations with more than $1 million in annual profit. The new tax is estimated to generate $800 million in annual revenue. Last year, New Jersey Policy Perspective (NJPP) published a report on the benefits of using the corporate surcharge as a dedicated source of funding for NJ Transit, which remains the only transit agency of its kind without dedicated public funding. In response to the new proposal to fund NJ Transit, NJPP releases the following statement.

Alex Ambrose, Policy Analyst:

“It’s hard to overstate how big of a deal this is for transit riders and the state as a whole. The governor’s proposal would finally provide stable, dedicated funding to an agency that’s never had it, setting a strong foundation to protect NJ Transit now and in the future. This is exactly the type of thinking needed to get NJ Transit back on track, and it’s long past time that big corporations pay for the infrastructure that helps them generate their record-breaking profits. At the same time, we can’t forget that riders are staring down a potential double-digit fare hike, and the agency is still raiding its capital budget, so there’s a strong argument for bringing back the full corporate surcharge to spare commuters from shouldering that burden.”

Read NJPP’s report, Getting Back on Track: Fully Fund NJ Transit by Taxing Big Corporations.

###

Older Posts »»